McAfee Total Protection – Simple Download, Powerful Windows Tools.

Download McAfee Total Protection

Screen Photos

Get McAfee Total Protection

1. Home
2. Windows
3. Security Software
4. Antivirus Software
5. McAfee Total Protection

McAfee Gross Guarding toward Windows

• By McAfee
• Free
• User Rating

Download now

Used McAfee Total Protection for Windows? Share your experience and help other users.

Key Attributes of McAfee Summed-up Protection

• Get premium IT security tool, identity and privacy protection in support of your Sets, Macs, smartphones, equally tablets.
• Last updated on Month of romance 27, 2024
• There have been 5 updates
• Virus scan status:

  Clean (it’s extremely prone that this programming program is clean)

McAfee Overall amount Protection 0/1

Editors’ Review

Download.com staffFebruary 27, 2024

The depth line: McAfee takes ambition at blocking robots in its latest configuration, although weak test scores reveal that we don't recommend this year's McAfee suite.

Review:McAfee released a major overhaul regarding its security facility back in 2010, coming up with a new in a standing position oriented interface that made navigating much easier. Since then, the annual updates have been incremental at outstanding, improving the factor cluster yet not making substantial updates overall. McAfee Total Protection 2012 adds some new features, but these stay frankly more about sustaining expand with the Joneses--or at least, keeping up with the Nortons and Kasperskys--than actually pushing any kind of innovation. Meanwhile, the suite's act on tests both from CNET Labs additionally unsubjugated sources calls within the bounds of question in what way effective it really is.

InstallationInstalling McAfee was where our problems with the suite began. A registration process was simple enough, but it also aggressively detects competing suites to none point where the slightest trace consisting of Schedule detritus will cause the configuration to freak out. On the condition that that happens to the inquirer, it aim to run to find the offending remnants. If it can't find them, you'll have to reboot and reinstall McAfee.

While there operate real security and show problems that might appear created by running two in contest suites simultaneously, this is the kind on the subject of worry that is not acceptable from in conjunction with every expensive security suite. We by the same token came into possession of problems when running other mandatory programs, such as this Web browser, while installing.

To the shame, McAfee's uninstallation process left a few Roster codes below, too.

InterfaceFirst introduced in 2010, the unusual lengthwise oriented composition is surprisingly straightforward to work with. Features have been clearly delineated, and potentially confusing names have been jettisoned. With regard to example, firewall settings control using what method you access the Web, in such a manner they're referenced under Web and E-mail Protection.

Also, McAfee stands out for not only color-coding what your status is, but also adding in what that means. The "Your node is secure" instruction is bolstered by "No maneuver required," a helpful tip. Pick on any of the four categories actually below the status bar coupled with the pane just to some other right reveals links that let this individual drill deeper into your security status. Mouse over the big subcategories at the bottom and a general status message manifests as next to each name. Click close to one instead of more configuration settings.

This was each strongest phase of the McAfee 2012 efforts, preparing no suite visually defined barring suspending usability.

Features and supportMcAfee provides a solid list of standard surveillance features, from antivirus and anti-malware protection, a two-way firewall, with content filter measures to real-time safeguards, family controls, and search result rankings.

As befits a high-end suite, Unified Watch 2012 also comes against some helpful extras, such as this secure file shredder, encrypted local storage, online backup, some basic Wi-Fi protection on home-based non-physical networks, and tools for tweaking apparatus performance.

It also introduces several new features. These include Net Guard, for blocking botnets and protecting your personal data from being sent out without your permission; a "hacked page" protection for blocking iFrames on malicious sites; "deep page" protection for preventing hacked pages within otherwise safe sites from resolving; and USB drive scanning.

The parental control package has materialized updated, too. Parents get safeguarding against blacklisted Virtual space traffic in programs other than the browser, such depending on instant-messaging applications; browsing logs; and the ability to monitor changes to whose clock to prevent clever kids from circumventing the suite's program timer.

Two other small but important new features address point all social territory of modern browsing, but are only available from McAfee's browser toolbar. One forms a custom URL shortener, routed through McAfee servers, and the second is a new site-sharing service with hooks into your Twitter, Web platform, and local work area. However, these seem limited to the browsers that support the quick access bar, which are Firefox as well Online sphere Explorer. Google Chrome and its rocketing store share stand ignored.

McAfee offers a pleasing set of features that keep it competitive, but nothing that really looks stepping forward or pushes the envelope.

PerformanceDespite the smart interface and effective features, McAfee's presentation has been abysmal if the object occurs to preventing threats, and middling when it comes regarding system benchmarks.

Since McAfee Total Shelter 2012 shares an engine having McAfee Internet Secureness 2012 and McAfee AntiVirus Plus 2012, CNET Creative spaces benchmarked all three. Note that while recent year's benchmarks were tested on its basic installation of Windows 7 x64, CNET Experimental rooms is now leveraging a Windows 7 x64 test bed flowing Service Pack 1. So while responses be more consistent than the colleague would be with, say, a Windows XP computer, there's in spite of that definite notable difference betwixt both test computers.

CNET Labs found whatever it is Total Protection's footprint regarding boot time was smaller than median, but that its sibling accommodations had with the worst boot-time impact of none tested this year. Equally although all three were highly dynamic along their disbandment times, they slipped below average again on scan times. Those three benchmarks are key, since those are the most noticeable during recurrent computer use, and we would've selected to see better marks here. However, McAfee appeared to have a more mundane effect on an in-use computer, collecting slightly above or delicately below average throughout all counts.

McAfee did skillfully but not great at real-world track time tests. Its quick scan averaged 8 minutes, 8 splits; that's much slower rather than many competitors. The full scan took this average of 2 hours, 5 minutes, longer than many competitors by about half an hour.

table.geekbox th{background-color:#E6ECEF;text-align:left;font-weight:bold;}table.geekbox tr.even{background-color:#CCCCCC;}.ratingGood{color:#093;} .ratingAverage{color:#666;} .ratingBad{color:#C00;}

Security program Boot time Interruption time Probe time MS Office performance iTunes decoding Media multiple task management Cinebench Unarmed system 40 6 n/a 395 120 342 17,711 Average embracing collective tested systems (to date) 67.4 16.2 1,058 414 125 347 17,129 McAfee AntiVirus With 2012 90.7 12.8 1,156 423 126 344 17,294 McAfee Internet Security 2012 96.3 15.9 1,276 411 125 344 17,164 McAfee Total Conservation 2012 61.8 11.3 1,299 409 125 348 17,243

Note: All tests evaluated in seconds, except in place of Cinebench. Onto the Cinebench experiment, higher numbers are better.

How good is their protection it offers? Surveying which results from several independent testing agencies, some other answer signifies probably going among cause abundance gnashing of teeth among McAfee admirers. AV-Test distinguished consistently low scores by reason of McAfee Total Protection 2011 during the first two quarters of 2011. Near one Windows 7 computer, McAfee scored 3 out of 6 on Protection, 2 spent of 6 on Repair, and 3.5 out of 6 on Usability, to an overall score of 8.5 out of 18 and failing the nominal of 11 for single AV-Test certificate.

In the second quarter, on a Sashes XP computer, McAfee Total Watchfulness 2011 and 2012 did marginally better. The suite hit 3 out of 6 over and Protection inclusive of Repair, and 3.5 out in the context of 6 on Usability, for a total of 9.5 out of 18, nevertheless not high enough to be certified.

Note that AV-Test defines its categories as is in the sequence of: "The 'Protection' covers static on top of dynamic malware detection, for example real-world zero-day attack testing. In case of 'Repair,' we check the network disinfection and rootkit removal in detail. Its 'Usability' testing comprehends the system slowdown caused by the machines and the number relating to false positives."

In short, AV-Test pinpointed McAfee Total Protection 2011 and the emerging 2012 by be not worth the frequency or effort, at least originating in every purely protective point of view.

The most recent AV-Comparatives.org Whole Product diagnostic, which looks at on-demand scanning, retroactive tests, and "real-world" guards including cloud-based protections, showed generally dark trends pertaining to McAfee 2011 with a sliver of light at all last chapter of the tunnel. From January 2011 through August 2011, McAfee was the third-worst suite tested on balance, future of only K7 and COMPUTING MACHINE Contraptions on top of a 93.6 percent blocked-threat judgment. That September 2011 test got a much better score, having blocked 98.7 percent pertaining to attacks and threats thrown at the element. That's fourth-best for the schedule, an impressive turnaround that bodes effectively for McAfee 2012, but it's not enough to factual for prior failures.

A third testing lab, Dennis Technical devices Labs, had the worst news consisting of some other lot for McAfee. From its January 2011 study, in its Overall Protection trial of high-end halls, Dennis Labs placed McAfee dead last out of 11, combined with an overall protection score of 54 percent. Dennis assigned McAfee past in the nation's Accuracy assessment, too.

It's fair concerning cap off that despite specimen glimmer of luminescence for the future, McAfee has had a horrifically bad year when it comes to independent testing. While it is true whether these tests turn more of a snapshot beneath time than the definitive word on anything, they do deliver us coupled with a reasonable photograph of the security field at a given moment. It's just not McAfee's moment.

ConclusionMcAfee has made good products in the past, besides it may well do it follows that again. However, the intertwined performance blemishes are a horror exhibit, and there are too many inconsistencies throughout the rest of the suite to overlook benchmarks in favor of reputation.

Give McAfee Total Protection 2012 a miss.

What’s new in version 433.0207.3919

Version 2019 (16.0 R22) conceivably subsume unestablished updates, enhancements, or bug fixes.

McAfee Whole Protection for Windows

• By McAfee
• Free
• User Rating

Download now

Used McAfee Total Protection for Windows? Deliver your experience and help spare users.

Explore More

• Shortcut Virus Remover

  Free

• Panda Free Antivirus

  Free

• Kaspersky Internet Security

  Trial version

• HitmanPro (64-bit)

  Trial version

• Bitdefender Antivirus Free

  Free

• RKill

  Free

• USB Rescate

  Free

• ThreatDown

  Paid

• Kaspersky Premium

  Paid

• SmitFraudFix

  Free

• 360 Total Security

  Free

• Quick Heal Total Security

  Free